Comparison
The Gaiam Premium 6mm Yoga Mat and MSPORTS Thick Yoga Mat both support yoga, Pilates, stretching, and home floor workouts. Gaiam is lighter, more compact, and less expensive, while MSPORTS delivers a much larger, softer, and more deeply cushioned surface. Choose based on whether you value balance and portability or maximum comfort and workout space.
#1 Overall Winner
Contender
Pick Gaiam for a lightweight, lower-cost mat with moderate cushioning and better small-space practicality. Pick MSPORTS if your main need is a wide, deeply padded surface for Pilates, stretching, and floor workouts. For balance-heavy yoga, Gaiam’s less-soft profile is likely the safer fit; for kneeling comfort, MSPORTS leads.
Overall winner
Depends on your needs
| Feature | Gaiam Yoga Mat - Premium 6mm Print Extra Thick Non Slip Exercise & Fitness Mat | MSPORTS Yoga Mat Premium Non Slip Thick | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary use | Yoga, Pilates, and floor workouts | Yoga, Pilates, stretching, and home workouts | Depends |
| Material | PVC, free of six specified phthalates | Nitrile Butadiene Rubber foam | Depends |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 0.6 inch | MSPORTS Yoga Mat Premium Non Slip Thick |
| Listed size | 68 by 24 inches | 74.5 by 32 inches | MSPORTS Yoga Mat Premium Non Slip Thick |
| Weight | 1.39 kg | 1.5 kg | Gaiam Yoga Mat - Premium 6mm Print Extra Thick Non Slip Exercise & Fitness Mat |
| Grip feedback | Generally positive, with sweaty-hand slip reports | Generally positive non-slip feedback | MSPORTS Yoga Mat Premium Non Slip Thick |
| Comfort | Moderate, supportive cushioning | Deep, soft cushioning | MSPORTS Yoga Mat Premium Non Slip Thick |
| Portability | Lightweight and compact; no strap stated | Includes strap but is thicker and larger | Gaiam Yoga Mat - Premium 6mm Print Extra Thick Non Slip Exercise & Fitness Mat |
| Durability feedback | Mostly positive long-term reports | Mixed; some reports of tearing | Gaiam Yoga Mat - Premium 6mm Print Extra Thick Non Slip Exercise & Fitness Mat |
| Initial odor | Airing out is specifically recommended | Reviews often report no strong odor | MSPORTS Yoga Mat Premium Non Slip Thick |
| Listed price | $18.26 | $39.99 | Gaiam Yoga Mat - Premium 6mm Print Extra Thick Non Slip Exercise & Fitness Mat |
| Included extras | Downloadable yoga workout | Carrying strap and yoga e-book | MSPORTS Yoga Mat Premium Non Slip Thick |
MSPORTS is better aligned with comfort-focused recovery sessions because its deep foam reduces the hard-floor feel during gentle stretching and mobility work. Gaiam also has enough cushioning for a practical cool-down or yoga routine, while its lighter build makes it easier to keep accessible in smaller homes. The difference is not about medical outcomes: it is about physical comfort during floor contact. Buyers who routinely experience discomfort from hard surfaces during stretches are more likely to appreciate the MSPORTS format.
Both mats are versatile foundations for low-impact home training, including yoga, Pilates, mobility work, core exercises, and bodyweight floor sessions. Gaiam offers a more conventional yoga-mat format: enough cushion for hard floors while remaining relatively firm, light, and compact. MSPORTS is more like a comfort-first exercise pad, with extra room and substantially deeper foam for sessions involving knees, elbows, back contact, or prolonged stretching. For a mixed routine that includes standing poses and occasional floor work, Gaiam is the more balanced tool. For mostly floor-based exercise, MSPORTS is more accommodating.
Neither mat is a replacement for stable flooring under heavy free weights, but both can support bodyweight strength work, core training, and kneeling movements. MSPORTS has the advantage for floor-based strength exercises because its thicker foam better cushions knees and elbows. Its softness may, however, create a less planted feeling in standing squats or balance work. Gaiam’s firmer 6 mm platform is more controlled for planks, lunges, and yoga-based strength work, but it provides less impact separation from hard flooring.
Neither product is primarily a cardio-training mat. They can work for warm-ups, cool-downs, and low-impact bodyweight intervals, but the supplied information does not establish suitability for high-impact jumping. Gaiam’s lighter, firmer format may be easier to reposition during mixed home workouts. MSPORTS offers more comfortable floor contact between intervals but its soft foam can be less suitable where a very firm, stable base is preferred. Choose based on the floor movements in the routine rather than expecting either mat to add cardio-specific features.
Both products are excellent fits for mobility, flexibility, yoga, and Pilates, with cushioning being a central benefit. Gaiam is better for users who want support while retaining a firmer connection to the floor for controlled transitions and balance poses. MSPORTS is the stronger option for longer stretching sessions, restorative positions, and mobility drills that place pressure on knees, hips, elbows, or the back. Its larger surface also gives more room to extend limbs. The choice is principally between Gaiam’s balanced support and MSPORTS’s deeper softness.
For gentle post-workout stretching and floor mobility, both mats create a more comfortable surface than bare flooring. MSPORTS has the edge for recovery-oriented routines because the thicker NBR foam is designed to reduce direct pressure during seated, kneeling, and supine positions. Gaiam remains useful for cool-down stretching and yoga flows while taking up less storage space. Neither mat should be treated as a medical or therapeutic product; their role is simply to provide a more comfortable and stable area for movement.
Each mat performs well within its intended role, but they emphasize different aspects of exercise comfort. Gaiam’s 6 mm PVC format is designed to combine cushioning with a stable surface for yoga, Pilates, and floor work. Review feedback broadly supports that balance, though sweaty-hand traction is not fully consistent. MSPORTS performs especially well where depth of padding and exercise area matter, and supplied buyers often describe it as secure and comfortable. Its key performance compromise is softness: some users may find the foam compresses more than desired for standing balance work. Neither has a clear advantage across every workout style.
Gaiam is well positioned for maintaining a regular yoga or mixed home-exercise habit because it is lightweight, rolls up easily, and has a lower entry price. Its included downloadable yoga workout may also help new users begin. MSPORTS supports consistent floor training through its generous dimensions, high cushioning, carrying strap, and yoga e-book. For beginners concerned about discomfort on hard floors, MSPORTS can reduce a practical barrier to stretching and Pilates. For users who need a mat that is easy to put away after every session, Gaiam creates less storage friction.
For mat-based strength work, MSPORTS provides more protection during kneeling exercises, glute bridges, core work, and other movements with prolonged floor contact. Its 32-inch width also leaves more room to move. Gaiam is the better choice when a firmer surface is important for planks, controlled transitions, and standing bodyweight work. The soft compression noted in MSPORTS feedback may be welcome for comfort but less appealing for users who dislike any rocking or sinking under their feet. Neither listing supports use as protective flooring for heavy lifting.
The supplied product information provides limited evidence for cardio-specific use. Both mats can support low-impact conditioning that includes floor movements, mobility intervals, and bodyweight exercises. Gaiam may be more convenient for mixed sessions because it is lighter and less bulky, while MSPORTS is more comfortable when the routine includes frequent kneeling or lying-down work. There is no provided evidence that either is optimized for high-impact exercise, so buyers should consider their flooring and the impact level of their chosen routine.
Mobility and flexibility work are the clearest shared strengths. Gaiam’s moderate thickness supports yoga positions while helping users feel stable through balance and transition work. MSPORTS offers a more protective platform for longer holds, seated stretches, and exercises where joints contact the floor. Its longer and wider listed dimensions are useful for full-body stretching. Users who like a firm, grounded sensation should favor Gaiam; those who prioritize softness around pressure points should favor MSPORTS.
MSPORTS is better aligned with comfort-focused recovery sessions because its deep foam reduces the hard-floor feel during gentle stretching and mobility work. Gaiam also has enough cushioning for a practical cool-down or yoga routine, while its lighter build makes it easier to keep accessible in smaller homes. The difference is not about medical outcomes: it is about physical comfort during floor contact. Buyers who routinely experience discomfort from hard surfaces during stretches are more likely to appreciate the MSPORTS format.
Both mats are intended to create a more cushioned exercise surface and both are presented as non-slip, but safe use still depends on the workout and environment. Gaiam’s more moderate thickness can aid stable footing in balance poses, while reviews indicate that sweaty hands may lose traction for some users. MSPORTS provides more cushioning, which may be useful for floor contact, but its softer foam can feel less firm for standing movements. Gaiam also discloses that its PVC is free from six named phthalates. Users should keep either mat clean, dry, and flat on a suitable floor.
MSPORTS is the more comfortable mat for users who want maximum protection from hard floors. Its 0.6-inch foam and larger dimensions are repeatedly praised for cushioning knees, joints, and the back during exercise. Gaiam is also notably comfortable, with 6 mm padding that reviewers find supportive without being excessively soft. That makes Gaiam the more balanced comfort option for users who still want a grounded feel. MSPORTS is preferable for pressure relief during floor work; Gaiam is preferable where comfort must coexist with firmer pose control.
Gaiam is easier to manage day to day for users who roll up and store their mat after each workout. Its lower weight and smaller dimensions simplify moving it between rooms or taking it to a class. It does require initial airing and more detailed care attention. MSPORTS includes a carrying strap and has straightforward hand-wash instructions, but its thick, wide foam is less compact when rolled. Buyers with dedicated workout space may not notice this difference; apartment users likely will.
Gaiam offers the more stable-feeling base for balance-oriented yoga because its 6 mm construction is less plush underfoot. Reviews commonly say it stays in place, though traction at the hands can become less reliable with sweat. MSPORTS is also frequently described as non-slip and steady on the floor, but its soft foam can compress during standing exercises. For kneeling and floor movements, that compression is often a comfort benefit. For users prioritizing a firm platform for standing poses, Gaiam has the clearer edge.
MSPORTS has the advantage in the supplied grip feedback. Buyers commonly describe the textured surface as truly non-slip and suitable for planks, stretching, and sweaty training. Gaiam’s sticky texture receives plenty of positive comments, but several reviews identify slippery hands during hot or sweaty sessions. A towel is one practical user-reported workaround for Gaiam. Grip can vary with sweat, cleaning, and the floor surface, so neither listing proves identical performance in every setting.
Gaiam is the clear small-space choice. Its 68 by 24 inch dimensions, 1.39 kg weight, and 6 mm profile make it easier to roll, tuck away, and transport. MSPORTS provides a considerably larger 74.5 by 32 inch surface, but that added room and 0.6-inch foam thickness create a bulkier roll. The included strap improves carrying, not storage volume. Choose Gaiam for apartments, shared rooms, or frequent travel to class; choose MSPORTS when permanent or semi-permanent floor space is available.
Neither product has a meaningful noise-specific distinction in the supplied data. Both soft exercise mats can help separate the body from a hard floor during low-impact floor movements, but neither listing establishes performance for reducing impact noise from jumping or heavy equipment. The better choice should therefore be based on cushioning, grip, and storage needs rather than a noise claim.
Gaiam’s construction is designed around a lightweight PVC mat with a printed, textured sticky surface. The supplied reviews frequently describe it as sturdy, supportive, and visually well finished, including reports of the print remaining visible with regular use. MSPORTS uses high-density NBR foam and is repeatedly described as soft, thick, and high quality by buyers. The principal build difference is density and feel rather than a clear quality gap: Gaiam is thinner and firmer, while MSPORTS is thicker and more compressible. The tear reports for MSPORTS temper confidence in its long-term construction.
Gaiam has the stronger durability case in the supplied information. Customer feedback includes regular use over more than a year without visible wear, flaking, or loss of print, although this does not guarantee identical results for every user. Its care instructions also warn against prolonged sun exposure, which may cause fading and brittleness. MSPORTS receives some positive durability comments, but the aggregated overview notes that some users report easy tearing. Buyers who expect frequent use and long-term storage should weigh that mixed feedback carefully.
MSPORTS has the simpler stated maintenance instruction: hand wash only. Gaiam provides more detailed care information, advising spot cleaning with a yoga mat wash or a damp cloth, cold water, and mild detergent, followed by flat drying. Gaiam owners should also air a new mat for two to three days and avoid extended sun exposure. MSPORTS may be simpler to understand, but Gaiam gives clearer guidance on protecting the mat over time. In either case, cleaning after sweaty use can help maintain a more usable surface.
Gaiam is more portable because it is slightly lighter and significantly thinner and narrower. Multiple supplied reviews describe it as easy to roll, carry around the house, and take to class. MSPORTS includes a strap, a meaningful practical advantage, but its larger 74.5 by 32 inch, 0.6-inch format is inherently bulkier. It is portable enough for occasional transport, yet it is better suited to users who mainly train at home and have room to store it.
For these non-consumable products, material disclosure is the relevant transparency measure. Gaiam identifies its material as PVC and specifically states that it is free from DEHP, DBP, BBP, DINP, DIDP, and DNOP. It also provides detailed care guidance, including initial airing, spot cleaning, drying flat, and avoiding prolonged sun exposure. MSPORTS identifies its material as Nitrile Butadiene Rubber and lists hand washing only. Gaiam provides the more detailed material-related disclosure, while MSPORTS clearly communicates the core foam material and simple care requirement.
Gaiam offers the stronger value proposition for the average buyer at its lower listed price of $18.26. It combines moderate cushioning, low weight, clear material disclosure, a downloadable class, and an especially large pool of positive reviews. MSPORTS costs $39.99 but adds a substantially larger surface, far deeper cushioning, and a carrying strap. That premium can be worthwhile for users who would otherwise need extra padding for knees or a wider workout area. Gaiam is the better budget value; MSPORTS is better value only when its comfort and size advantages are genuinely needed.
The supplied data gives Gaiam an advantage in buyer confidence because it has a much larger review count and a long pattern of positive feedback around comfort, design, and routine use. Its listing also offers detailed material and care information. MSPORTS has strong customer satisfaction in the available data and clear NBR material disclosure, but there is less supporting review volume and some durability inconsistency. This comparison does not establish broader brand reputation or service quality beyond the product information provided.
Both mats have high star ratings and extensive positive feedback, particularly for comfort. Gaiam has the larger review base, with buyers often praising its cushioning, prints, lightweight handling, and value. Repeated negative themes are initial odor and variable grip once hands are sweaty. MSPORTS reviews consistently highlight deep padding, generous size, softness, and non-slip performance. Its main recurring concerns are the bulky roll, a feel that can be too squishy for some standing movements, and isolated reports of tearing. Overall sentiment is favorable for both, with different trade-offs.
The core functional claims are reasonably aligned with the listed materials, dimensions, care instructions, and buyer feedback, but they should be read as product descriptions rather than independently verified performance guarantees. Gaiam’s 6 mm dimensions, PVC material, specified phthalate exclusions, and initial-odor care guidance are clearly stated. MSPORTS clearly states its NBR foam, 0.6-inch thickness, and listed dimensions. Reviews support general comfort for both products, while also qualifying non-slip and durability claims: Gaiam can be slippery when sweaty for some users, and MSPORTS has some tear reports.
Gaiam is the better overall pick for most yoga and home-workout buyers because it is substantially less expensive, lighter, easier to store, and supported by a very large volume of favorable feedback. Its main strengths are balanced 6 mm cushioning, everyday portability, and clear PVC material disclosure. Its main limitations are possible initial odor and less reliable grip for some sweaty users.
MSPORTS wins on comfort and workout space. Its thick NBR foam and wider, longer layout make it highly appealing for Pilates, stretching, and joint-sensitive floor work. The drawbacks are its bulkier storage profile, higher price, soft standing feel, and mixed durability reports. Pick Gaiam for versatile yoga; pick MSPORTS for maximum padding.
Overall winner
Depends on your needs
The better choice depends on the feel you need. Gaiam is the more compact, lower-priced option with moderate 6 mm cushioning and a firmer base for general yoga. MSPORTS is better suited to buyers who want substantially more padding and a larger exercise area, provided they can accommodate its bulkier roll.
MSPORTS has the advantage for comfort-led Pilates and floor workouts because its 0.6-inch NBR foam is thicker and its listed 74.5 by 32 inch dimensions provide more movement room. Gaiam remains a practical alternative for users who prefer less compression under them and easier storage after a session.
Gaiam is the more convenient choice for carrying and compact storage. It weighs 1.39 kg, measures 68 by 24 inches, and is described by reviewers as easy to roll and move. MSPORTS includes a strap, but its thicker and wider foam construction takes up more space when rolled.
Both products are marketed with non-slip surfaces, but the supplied feedback is more mixed for Gaiam when hands become sweaty. Several reviewers still found it grippy, while others used a towel for sweaty planks. MSPORTS has more consistently positive supplied grip feedback, although individual surface conditions can still affect traction.
MSPORTS provides more cushioning on the listed specifications: its 0.6-inch foam is much thicker than Gaiam’s 6 mm mat. That can be useful for kneeling, stretching, and floor work on hard surfaces. Gaiam still receives strong comfort feedback while offering a less soft, more controlled platform.
Gaiam may be the more suitable option for balance-focused yoga because its 6 mm profile offers cushioning without the very soft compression noted in MSPORTS feedback. One MSPORTS reviewer specifically described the foam as squishy under standing movements. Traction can vary for Gaiam when hands are very sweaty.
Gaiam is the stronger value choice for buyers who want a dependable, lightweight mat at the lower listed price. It has extensive positive review feedback and clear material-care guidance. MSPORTS costs more, but its larger dimensions, deeper cushioning, and included strap can justify that difference for comfort-first home users.
Gaiam should be spot cleaned with a damp cloth, cold water, and mild detergent, then dried flat; it should also be kept out of prolonged sun exposure. New Gaiam mats should be aired out for two to three days. MSPORTS lists hand washing only, so buyers should follow that instruction for its NBR foam.
Check our rankings and expert guides to find the best fitness products for your goals.
